|
Aikido
Ronin* in Europe
Written by
Gaku Homma
Nippon Kan Kancho
3-24-05
*Ronin is the Japanese term for master less samurai.
In my travels to teach in countries around
the world, I have been surprised to see how many different kinds
of
membership cards or “passports” are
carried by practicing Aikidoka. Membership cards these days are
not just a simple card with the organizations name on it. Today
membership cards are more like small books with photos, kyu and
dan promotion records, seminar attendance and practice history
reports. In the U.S. these are called Aikido passports. In Japan
they are called kokusai yudanshasho. I personally call them keikocho
or practice notes.
In our Aikido world, the word Aikido used
to be synonymous with the Aikikai organization. Today however
there are many organizations
that have formed from the overflow of a rapidly expanded Aikikai
organization. There are also many organizations that have developed
from all-together different roots and lineage than Aikikai
resulting in an even a larger variety of keikocho. There have
been seminars
I have instructed at where students brought over ten different
kinds of affiliated keikocho to be signed for attendance.
At
one seminar I studied the keikocho that had been brought to
me and
reflected on the names of instructors listed there. There
were signatures of Shihan that have already passed away, or
abrupt changes in affiliated instructors were listed noting
the political
journey of the student. You could follow the history of a student’s
dojo or organization just by reading the pages.
Recently I
instructed at a seminar where one Aikidoka brought me his
keikocho to sign. He had been practicing for over twelve
years,
and in his passport, his nidan certification had been recorded.
His keikocho showed that he had attended seventy four seminars
instructed by high ranking instructors from Europe, the United
States and Japan. His shodan and nidan ranking certification
had been signed by the late Morihiro Saito Shihan-Aikikai
9th Dan yet
this student’s passport was not issued by Aikikai.
His passport and others from his dojo had been issued by
the late
Morihiro Saito
Shihan and bore the name of Iwama Ryu.
Following the death
of Morihiro Saito Shihan, this Aikidoka and his dojo had
neither joined Aikikai officially or followed
the
son of Morihiro Saito Shihan, Hitohiro Saito Jukucho as
he formed his own independent organization Shin Shin Aiki Shuren
Kai Tanren
Juku. In other words, this group had not moved to join
any
organization, but had chosen instead to become Aikido ronin
or “masterless
samurai”.
On the Nippon Kan website, I have written
on occasion about the late Morihiro Saito Shihan and
his son Hitohiro Saito
Jukucho. While doing research for these articles I consulted
senior
students
who studied under Morihiro Saito Shihan. Through them
I learned many things about the time of transition following
Saito
Shihan’s
death. I had become aware of the emergence of new Aikido
ronin, especially in Europe, but holding this keikocho
in my hand brought
it home to me what a big problem this presented.
During
his lifetime Morihiro Saito Shihan, an instructor of
highest ranking at Aikikai, issued his own certification
from
his own organization.
This was well known amongst Aikikai administrators
during those years and was never publicly condemned. The fact
that Aikikai
was aware of these activities is irrefutable and yet
at that time no
public objection by Aikikai against this practice by
Saito Shihan was issued or enforced. This can be confirmed
by
the fact that
during that time period many students of Saito Shihan
received their yudansha certification from Aikikai.
The students who have now become Aikido ronin
are innocent students who pursued their training of Aikido
in earnest
under their own
instructor’s direction. Unfortunately these
students have now become collateral damage of the
politics of
their predecessors.
After Saito Shihan’s death, and the departure
from Aikikai of his son Hitohiro Saito Jukucho, this
generation of students
have found themselves not only homeless, but without
a history or foundation for the future.
After Saito
Shihan’s death, most of his students chose
to stay with Aikikai. There were however students
from this transition who were not allowed to join
Aikikai at their current ranks or
status. Students that received their yudansha ranks
from Aikikai through Saito Shihan were welcomed
to join Aikikai directly after
his death. Those however that receive their ranking
directly from
Saito Shihan were not. The transfer of the ranking
of these students was refused by Aikikai, which
has resulted understandably with
a feeling of bitterness and betrayal.
I asked one
of these Aikido ronin students why they did not
join Hitohiro Jukucho’s new organization. “Our
teacher was Morihiro Saito Shihan. His son Hitohiro
Jukucho is of no consequence
to us, especially now that he has left Aikikai.
When we were students of Saito Shihan we always
assumed that we were part of Aikikai,
and that we could continue on with Aikikai affiliation
after his death. Saito Shihan was after all an
Aikikai instructor. It was
such a shock for us to have the ranking we received
from Saito Shihan refused by Aikikai. We wish
to continue to be part of Aikikai
and wish to transfer our ranking, even if we
have to transfer one level down, that would be
okay.
I have practiced Aikido for many
years and operate my own dojo. Starting over
with Aikikai without any rank would affect my
ability
to make a living. We have been
loyal students to our instructors, following
their directions to the letter. Nothing was ever
said
to us by Aikikai administration
that the ranking we received directly from Saito
Shihan was not Aikikai approved. All of the years
of practice, all of the effort,
loyalty and money spent to achieve the ranks
we hold disappeared in the moment Aikikai refused
to transfer our ranks”.
As an analogy,
if a loan officer of a bank begins making loans
on his own accord and breaks policy
by doing
so, he or she
would be stopped by the bank. If the bank was
aware of the officer’s
actions and did nothing or said nothing about
his actions, jeopardizing the clients adversely,
the bank would be held liable.
“We cannot understand why we have been
cut off in this way, and we feel victimized. All of the students
who have been
affected
this way have organized and we are seriously
considering filing a class action type of law suit against
Aikikai for this unfair
treatment”.
I listened to this story
with growing concern and sadness. I know
that money is not the primary
concern,
but I
couldn’t help
but think that this person in his twelve
year Aikido career had not only spent a lot
of time
and energy but he had spent quite
a sum of money for monthly dojo dues, registration
fees, testing fees and promotion donations
not to mention the costs that are
were incurred to attend seventy four seminars.
Even just thinking about this one facet of
the problem was enough to understand this
student’s anger and disappointment.
If these students proceed with this class
action law suite, whether they win or lose,
the affect
on Aikikai
would be
a serious one.
Not only facing possible monetary loss,
Aikikai’s
reputation would be immeasurably damaged.
Aikikai needs its reputation intact
to continue the government support it receives
plus the support it maintains from corporate
and foundation donations. In today’s
world where communications can be achieved
almost instantaneous, the ability of this
group to rally others around the world
to this cause would not be difficult.
Aikikai
has grown into a far reaching global
organization, but I am concerned that
it historically has not and
still does not have
clear mandates, rules of conduct or a
system of responsibility for the actions of its
instructors. As a result,
situations like this have become part
of the consequence.
This
situation is ultimately
the responsibility of the parent organization
Aikikai, in the same way that resulting
complications by
the actions of a bank
loan
officer are the responsibility of the
bank.
I think that Aikikai needs to act swiftly
with wisdom and an eye toward the future
to remedy
this situation.
If Aikikai
administrators
take the time to deal with this growing
contingent of Aikido ronin and work
out a positive solution,
they will
provide
a
model of
understanding and Aikido philosophy
in action. The students in this case are
innocent, and
do not deserve
to be punished
for a
situation not of their making.
|